Buying land in Chile's border zones: the rule that does not apply to most foreigners

Short answer: the famous ban on foreigners buying land near the Chilean border does not apply to most foreigners. Article 7 of Decree Law 1.939 prohibits acquiring property in declared border zones to nationals of countries that share a border with Chile, which means Argentina, Bolivia and Peru, and to companies controlled from those countries. A citizen of the United States, Canada, Germany or Japan is not covered by it. What does reach every non Chilean buyer is a different article of the same decree, article 6, and it is about state owned land rather than private property.

The rule everyone quotes, and what it actually says

Almost every conversation about buying rural land in Chile reaches the same point. Someone says that foreigners cannot buy near the border, the deal stalls, and two weeks are lost while everyone looks for an answer. The rule exists, it is in force, and it is much narrower than its reputation.

The text is article 7 of Decree Law 1.939 of 1977, which governs the acquisition, administration and disposal of state assets. Its first paragraph prohibits, for reasons of national interest, acquiring ownership or other rights in rem, or exercising possession or holding, over real property located wholly or partly in the areas of national territory declared border zones under Decree with Force of Law 4 of 1967 of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and it directs that prohibition at nationals of neighbouring countries.

Two things follow from reading it slowly. The prohibition is defined by the nationality of the buyer, not by the fact of being foreign. And it operates on a geography that is not the border itself but the zones a supreme decree has declared as such. Everything else about buying here as a foreign national works the way we set it out in the guide on buying property in Chile as a foreigner.

Who the prohibition actually reaches

Chile has three land borders: Peru to the north, Bolivia to the northeast and Argentina along its whole eastern edge. Those are the nationalities article 7 is aimed at. Until 1993 the text tied the ban to reciprocity, meaning it applied where those countries imposed similar limits on Chileans. Law 19.256 replaced that condition, and the article now rests only on national interest.

The second paragraph extends the prohibition to legal entities, and this is the part that matters when someone proposes to solve the problem with a company. It reaches companies whose principal seat is in the neighbouring country, companies whose capital belongs in forty per cent or more to nationals of that country, and companies whose effective control is in the hands of nationals of those countries. Ownership through a Chilean company does not launder the nationality of whoever is behind it.

Where the border zone is, and how to find out

The border zone is not a fixed band of so many kilometres written into the law. Decree with Force of Law 4 of 1967 of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs empowers the President of the Republic to determine, by supreme decree and whenever it is considered necessary, which areas of Chilean territory are to be treated as border zones. So the answer to whether a particular property sits inside one is a cartographic question, not a question of distance.

In practice the working reference is the cartography held by the National Directorate of State Borders and Boundaries, known by its Spanish acronym DIFROL, which publishes the border zone layer drawn at a scale of one to fifty thousand over the base cartography of the Military Geographic Institute. That layer is what a surveyor overlays on the property boundaries to answer the question properly.

This matters because the boundary is often not intuitive. A property can be far from any crossing and still fall inside, and a property that feels remote can sit entirely outside. If the land has never been surveyed against a plan, the prior problem is not the border rule but the boundaries themselves, which is the subject of the guide on rectifying registered area and boundaries.

State land: the rule that does reach every foreigner

Article 6 of the same decree law is the one that applies to a buyer of any nationality, and it is routinely confused with article 7. It says that state owned land situated up to ten kilometres measured from the border may only be obtained, in ownership, lease or under any other title, by Chilean natural or legal persons.

The same article deals with the coast. State owned land up to five kilometres from the coast measured from the high tide line follows the same rule, with one opening: it may be granted to foreigners domiciled in Chile, subject to a favourable report from the naval authority. And state owned beach land within the strip of eighty metres measured from the high tide line cannot be transferred at all.

The distinction that saves the deal: article 6 is about state land, article 7 is about private land. If what is being sold is already registered in a private name in the Registry of Property, article 6 has nothing to say. If the seller is offering land whose title traces back to an irregular occupation of fiscal ground, the problem is far bigger than the border rule, and it belongs to the analysis in our guide to regularisation of title.

The sworn statement you will sign at the notary

Article 8 makes notaries and registrars responsible for compliance with article 7, and requires notaries to demand from the parties a written statement, under oath, of their nationality and place of birth. This is why a purchase deed in Chile asks a foreign buyer to declare where they were born, a question that surprises people who assume it is bureaucratic curiosity.

It is not. That statement is the mechanism by which the prohibition is policed at the moment of signing. The same article punishes whoever breaches the prohibition by means of false documents, a simulated contract or similar deceit, and it sanctions the notary or registrar who fails to demand the statement. For a buyer who is not a national of a neighbouring country the statement is simply signed and the matter ends there.

The buyer also needs a Chilean tax number before the deed, which is a separate requirement that catches people out more often than the border rule does. How that is obtained without travelling is set out in the guide on getting a Chilean RUT without travelling.

The exemption, and what it takes

For a buyer who is covered by the prohibition, article 7 provides a way out, and it is deliberately narrow. The President of the Republic may exempt a person by name and expressly, by a reasoned supreme decree issued through the Ministry of the Interior and also signed by the Ministers of Foreign Affairs and of National Defence, with reports from the Joint Chiefs of Staff and from DIFROL.

Read that list again and the practical conclusion is obvious: this is not a permit counter. It is an individual decision taken at the highest level of government, with two ministries co signing and two institutional reports behind it. It is not something to build a purchase timetable around. An Argentine or Peruvian buyer looking at border zone land should treat the property as unavailable unless the exemption is already in hand.

The Arica exception

There is one territorial carve out. Article 19 of Law 19.420, the statute that created incentives for the development of Arica and Parinacota, lifts the prohibition for natural persons and companies of neighbouring countries alike, but only in specific areas of the commune of Arica: the urban perimeter of the city, two industrial parks, the areas declared centres of tourist interest, and any others designated by reasoned supreme decree. Article 7 itself refers to it. It is a narrow exception attached to a development regime, not a general opening.

Outside that, the far north has a legal landscape of its own, with forms of ownership that do not exist further south and that catch foreign buyers by surprise. We covered them separately in buying land in northern Chile.

Two other limits that stop more sales than the border rule

In our experience the border rule is the one people ask about and almost never the one that blocks the purchase. Two others do it far more often.

Indigenous land

Article 13 of Law 19.253 provides that indigenous land, because the national interest so requires, may not be transferred, attached, encumbered or acquired by prescription, except between communities or indigenous persons of the same people. Acts and contracts entered into against that article are absolutely void. This does not depend on the nationality of the buyer at all, and it does not appear on the surface of a sale advertisement. The detail is in our guide to indigenous land.

Title that does not survive a reading

Far more deals die because the seller cannot show a clean chain of title over the last ten years, because what is being sold is an undivided share rather than a defined plot, or because the registered area does not match what is on the ground. The first of those is the subject of the guide to shares and rights, and the review itself is what our title study service is for.

What to check before you sign

1. The commune and the coordinates, not the impression. Ask for the registered plan and have the boundaries overlaid on the DIFROL border zone layer. A verbal assurance that the property is outside is worth nothing.
2. Whether the land is private or state owned. A current title certificate from the Registrar of Real Property of the commune where the land lies answers this in a day.
3. Your own nationality position. If any buyer, or any shareholder of the buying company, holds Argentine, Bolivian or Peruvian nationality, the second paragraph of article 7 has to be worked through before anything is signed.
4. Whether the land is indigenous land under Law 19.253, which is checked against the registry of the national indigenous development corporation and against the title itself.
5. The ten year chain of title, encumbrances and prohibitions, which is the ordinary review any purchase needs and which we describe from the buyer's side in checking a Chilean property from abroad.

One more thing worth saying plainly. Border zone land is often marketed as remote and cheap, and remote and cheap is exactly the profile of the sales that go wrong in Chile. The five checks that prevent almost every loss are the same ones we set out for buying land in Patagonia, and they apply here without a change.

If the land is rural and the plan is to divide it, there is a second layer of rules that has nothing to do with the border and everything to do with minimum plot size. Our subdivision test gives a first reading of whether a given plot can be divided, and the rural subdivision service handles it when it can.

How we work on it

For a buyer outside Chile the border question is answered as part of the title study, not as a separate errand. We read the registered title, overlay the plan on the border zone cartography, check the indigenous land registry, and put the answer in writing before any money moves. When the title itself needs work before it can be sold safely, that is handled by our title regularisation service, and a first reading of whether a property needs it can be had from the regularisation test.

None of it requires the buyer to travel. The whole review is documentary, and a power of attorney granted at a Chilean consulate is enough for the signing itself.

If you are Argentine, Bolivian or Peruvian, the next step is the exemption procedure, the items the regulation requires and the one year rule for anyone who inherits a property in a border zone. All of that is in whether an Argentine can buy land in Chile.

For a German buyer this rule does not apply, but other differences do: Germany has no tax treaty in force with Chile, and German documents need an apostille and a translation. They are set out in whether a German can buy land in Chile.

Frequently asked questions